<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giving Yourself Away…</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dapperalchemist.com/2008/09/03/giving-yourself-away/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dapperalchemist.com/2008/09/03/giving-yourself-away/</link>
	<description>Exploring the collisions between science and art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:48:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tobie</title>
		<link>http://dapperalchemist.com/2008/09/03/giving-yourself-away/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>tobie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 11:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dapperalchemist.wordpress.com/?p=542#comment-59</guid>
		<description>hi Dapper Alchemist, we thought of this project as a collaboration between engineers and designers, rather than engineers and artists. The outcomes then, are speculative products, in that they are conceived and designed to be a part of material culture, and interact with markets and retail institutions and users, but don&#039;t actually go on to get manufactured in large volumes. This isn&#039;t a conceit, I think you hit the nail on the head when you mentioned &quot;Although, artists themselves foster a certain amount of mystique about their craft&quot;, and on the other hand, to go on to develop a prototype as a real product, the process becomes pretty boring and introspective. So Biojewellery sits in the middle, hopefully accessible and also critical. BTW, see www.materialbeliefs.com for a science and society project working with similar methods and processes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Dapper Alchemist, we thought of this project as a collaboration between engineers and designers, rather than engineers and artists. The outcomes then, are speculative products, in that they are conceived and designed to be a part of material culture, and interact with markets and retail institutions and users, but don&#8217;t actually go on to get manufactured in large volumes. This isn&#8217;t a conceit, I think you hit the nail on the head when you mentioned &#8220;Although, artists themselves foster a certain amount of mystique about their craft&#8221;, and on the other hand, to go on to develop a prototype as a real product, the process becomes pretty boring and introspective. So Biojewellery sits in the middle, hopefully accessible and also critical. BTW, see <a href="http://www.materialbeliefs.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.materialbeliefs.com</a> for a science and society project working with similar methods and processes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
